CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 18, DIVISION 3, CHAPTER 3.5, SUBCHAPTER 17, Article 2.5, Section 25137 REGARDING OTHER APPORTIONMENT METHODS
This handout is intended only for purposes of facilitating discussion at the Interested Parties Meeting (IPM) scheduled for December 4, 2019. The proposed amendments from the November 26, 2018 IPM are in single underline for additions and single strikeout for deletions. Changes made for this IPM are in underline and bold for additions and strikeout and bold for deletions.
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
Section 25137 is amended to read:
§ 25137. Other Apportionment Methods.
(a) Special Rules. In General. Section 25137 provides that if the allocation and apportionment provisions of the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act do not fairly represent the extent of the taxpayer's business activity in this state, the taxpayer may petition for or the Franchise Tax Board may require, in respect to all or any part of the taxpayer's business activity, if reasonable:
(1) Separate accounting;
(2) The exclusion of any one or more of the factors;
(3) The inclusion of one or more additional factors which will fairly represent the taxpayer's business activity in this state; or
(4) The employment of any other method to effectuate an equitable allocation and apportionment of the taxpayer's income.
Section 25137 permits a departure from the allocation and apportionment provisions of the Uniform Division of Income for Tax Purposes Act only in limited and specific cases.
Section 25137 may be invoked only in specific cases where unusual fact situations (which ordinarily will be unique and nonrecurring) produce incongruous results under the apportionment and allocation provisions contained in these regulations.
In the case of certain industries such as air transportation, rail transportation, ship transportation, trucking, television, radio, motion pictures, various types of professional athletics, and so forth, the foregoing regulations in respect to the apportionment formula do not set forth appropriate procedures for determining the apportionment factors. Nothing in Section 25137 or in this Regulation shall preclude the Franchise Tax Board from establishing appropriate procedures under Sections 25129 to 25136 inclusive, for determining the apportionment factors for each such industry, but such procedures shall be applied uniformly.
(b) Special Rules. Property Factor.
(1) The following special rules for determining the net annual rental rate as provided by California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 25130, subsection (b), are established in respect to the property factor of the apportionment formula:
(A) Subrents. If the subrents taken into account in determining the net annual rental rate under Regulation 25130, subsection (b), produce a negative or clearly inaccurate value for any item of property, another method which will properly reflect the value of rented property may be required by the Franchise Tax Board or requested by the taxpayer.
In no case however shall such value be less than an amount which bears the same ratio to the annual rental rate paid by the taxpayer for such property as the fair market value of that portion of the property used by the taxpayer bears to the total fair market value of the rented property.
EXAMPLE:
The taxpayer rents a 10-story building at an annual rental rate of $1,000,000. Taxpayer occupies two stories and sublets eight stories for $1,000,000 a year. The net annual rental rate of the taxpayer must not be less than two-tenths of the taxpayer's annual rental rate for the entire year, or $200,000.
(B) Property of others in general. If property owned by others is used by the taxpayer at no charge or rented by the taxpayer for a nominal rate, the net annual rental rate for such property shall be determined on the basis of a reasonable market rental rate for such property.
(C) Natural resources. Without regard to whether the following property is also described in subsection (b)(1)(B), if a taxpayer enters upon property owned by others for the purpose of extracting natural resources such as timber, oil, gas or hard minerals, and irrespective of whether such entry or extraction is pursuant to an agreement between the holder of the interest in the property and the taxpayer (and also irrespective of whether such relationship is characterized as a profit à prendre or some other relationship), consideration actually paid by the taxpayer to the holder of the interest in the property that constitutes a sharing of current or future production or extraction of the timber, oil, gas or hard minerals from such property (irrespective of the method of payment or how such consideration is characterized, whether as a royalty, advance royalty, rental or otherwise) and consideration actually paid by the taxpayer for the right to enter the property and extract the timber, oil, gas or hard minerals (such as forest management fees, fire protection fees, reforestation or reclamation fees, road maintenance fees, etc.) for the taxable year at issue shall constitute the net annual rental rate. The net annual rental rate shall then be multiplied by eight (8) in accordance with Revenue and Taxation Code section 25130. Improvements shall not be included in the calculation of a net annual rental rate, but are separately accounted for. (See California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 25130, subsection (b)(5).)
EXAMPLE: On December 31, 2000, a taxpayer engaged in the paper products business enters into a 50-year forest management agreement with a government entity to commence January 1, 2001, that allows it to extract 100,000 cords of timber per year from forests owned by that government entity. In exchange for the right to enter the government's land and extract timber, the taxpayer agrees to pay a royalty fee of $10.00 per cord extracted, plus a $10,000 per year access fee, $10,000 fire protection fee for any fires caused by the taxpayer, and an additional reforestation fee of 10 percent of the royalty fee paid. The forest management agreement also requires the taxpayer to make $1 million worth of improvements to an existing mill facility owned by the government entity. In taxable year 2001, the taxpayer extracts 50,000 cords and does not cause any fires to occur. It also makes the $1 million in improvements to the existing mill facility. The taxpayer therefore pays the government entity the $10,000 access fee, $500,000 in royalty fees ($10.00 per cord times 50,000 cords), and an additional $50,000 for the reforestation fee (10 percent of the $500,000 royalty fee). Under these facts, the taxpayer is entitled to claim $560,000 as the net annual rental rate. The taxpayer reports $4,480,000 ($560,000 multiplied by 8) for property factor purposes for this property for taxable year 2001. In addition, the taxpayer reports the $1 million in improvements in the property factor as property owned by the taxpayer in accordance with California Code of Regulations, title 18, section 25130, subsection (b)(5), for taxable year 2001.
(D) Definitions. For purposes of subsection (b) the following definitions apply.
1. A “reasonable market rental rate” shall mean the rate at which a lessor is willing to lease and a lessee is willing to pay in an open and competitive marketplace for the property.
2. A “nominal rate” shall mean a token payment compared to a rental rate at which a lessor is willing to lease and a lessee is willing to pay in an open and competitive marketplace for the property.
3. “Agreement” shall mean contract, lease or similar arrangement for the use of property.
(c) Special Rules -Sales Factor.
(1) The following special rules are established in respect to the sales factor of the apportionment formula:
(A) Where substantial amounts of gross receipts arise from an occasional sale of a fixed asset or other property held or used in the regular course of the taxpayer's trade or business, such gross receipts shall be excluded from the sales factor. For example, gross receipts from the sale of a factory, patent, or affiliate's stock will be excluded if substantial. For purposes of this subsection, sales of assets to the same purchaser in a single year will be aggregated to determine if the combined gross receipts are substantial.
1. For purposes of this subsection, a sale is substantial if its exclusion results in a five percent or greater decrease in the sales factor denominator of the taxpayer or, if the taxpayer is part of a combined reporting group, a five percent or greater decrease in the sales factor denominator of the group as a whole.
2. For purposes of this subsection, a sale is occasional if the transaction is outside of the taxpayer's normal course of business and occurs infrequently.
(B) Insubstantial amounts of gross receipts arising from incidental or occasional transactions or activities may be excluded from the sales factor unless such exclusion would materially affect the amount of income apportioned to this state. For example, the taxpayer ordinarily may include or exclude from the sales factor gross receipts from such transactions as the sale of office furniture, business automobiles, etc.
(C) Where the income producing activity in respect to business income from intangible personal property can be readily identified, such income is included in the denominator of the sales factor and, if the income producing activity occurs in this state, in the numerator of the sales factor as well. For example, usually the income producing activity can be readily identified in respect to interest income received on deferred payments on sales of tangible property (Regulation 25134, sub. (a)(1)(A)) and income from the sale, licensing or other use of intangible personal property (Regulation 25136, sub. (b)(4)).
Where business income from intangible property cannot readily be attributed to any particular income producing activity of the taxpayer, such income cannot be assigned to the numerator of the sales factor for any state and shall be excluded from the denominator of the sales factor. For example, where business income in the form of dividends received on stock, royalties received on patents or copyrights, or interest received on bonds, debentures or government securities results from the mere holding of the intangible personal property by the taxpayer, such dividends and interest shall be excluded from the denominator of the sales factor.
(D) The numerator and denominator of the sales factor shall exclude interest and dividends from intangible assets held in connection with a treasury function of the taxpayer's unitary business as well as the gross receipts and overall net gains from the maturity, redemption, sale, exchange or other disposition of such intangible assets.
1. “Treasury function” is the pooling, management, and investment of intangible assets for the purpose of satisfying the cash flow needs of the trade or business, such as providing liquidity for a taxpayer's business cycle, providing a reserve for business contingencies, business acquisitions, etc. A treasury function includes the use of futures contracts and options contracts to hedge foreign currency fluctuations. A treasury function does not include a taxpayer's trading function that engages in futures and option transactions for the purpose of hedging price risk of the products or commodities consumed, produced, or sold by the taxpayer. A taxpayer principally engaged in the trade or business of purchasing and selling intangible assets of the type typically held in a taxpayer's treasury function, such as a registered broker-dealer, is not performing a treasury function with respect to income so produced.
2. This subsection shall not apply to entities that apportion their income under the rules of regulation 25137-4.2.
3. This subsection is applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2007.
(d) In cases deemed appropriate by the Franchise Tax Board it may elect to hear and decide petitions filed pursuant to Section 25137 instead of having this function performed by the FTB staff or may elect to hear and decide a taxpayer's objection appeals of denied petitions for a to a variance action determination or FTB staff impositions of alternative apportionment methodologies pursuant to regulation section 25137. As a condition to having such petition considered by the Board, the petitioning taxpayer shall waive in writing the confidentiality provisions of Section 19542 with respect to such petition and to any other facts which may be deemed relevant in making a determination. Consideration of said petitions by the Board shall be open session at a regularly scheduled meeting.
(1) Definitions
(A) "Board member staff" means staff employed by any of the three members of the Franchise Tax Board.
(B) (A) “Brief” means a written document containing an argument or arguments supporting a party’s position. A brief may, but is not required to, include citations to specific laws, regulations, or other authorities. A brief may be in the form of a letter, other informal writing, or formal legal writing. Briefs are subject to the requirements identified in these regulations.
(C) (B) "Ex-parte communication" means any communication concerning a pending or impending petition to or from between one of the three-members of the Franchise Tax Board, itself and/or Franchise Tax Board member staff, outside the presence of either FTB staff or and the petitioner without notice to all parties and/or his or her representative, or FTB staff.
(D) (C) "Franchise Tax Board member staff" means staff employed by any of the three members of the Franchise Tax Board.
(E) (D) "FTB staff" means staff employed by the Franchise Tax Board and does not include any Franchise Tax member staff.
(E) "Open session at a regularly-scheduled meeting" means the open session of a Franchise Tax Board regularly-scheduled meeting of the Franchise Tax Board.
(F) "Three-member board" means California Franchise Tax Board as defined by California Government Code section 15700.
(G) To "make a record" means to memorialize in writing the identity of who initiated the inadvertent ex-parte communication, and all parties to the appeal who were entitled to participate. The record made must reflect the general substance of what was discussed and the response of any Franchise Tax Board member and/or the Board member's staff. If any documents are provided or exchanged, they must be identified, copied and made part of the record.
(H) (F) "Variance action" means a taxpayer filed petition for an alternative apportionment methodology pursuant to Section 25137 before FTB staff, or a FTB staff imposed imposition of an alternative apportionment methodology pursuant to Section 25137, to which the taxpayer objects.
(2) Petitions. In the event a variance action has been filed with Franchise Tax Board staff by a taxpayer, If the taxpayer desires to petition the Franchise Tax Board, itself, to hear and decide its petition filed pursuant to Section 25137 or of an adverse variance action determination, the following procedures shall apply:
(A) The taxpayer shall file its petition with the Chief Counsel of the Franchise Tax Board explaining why its requested alternative apportionment methodology pursuant to Section 25137 is warranted, or why FTB's staff's imposed alternative apportionment methodology is not warranted. Such petition shall be filed no later than either: and/or its representative, may present facts and assertions pertaining to the variance action in person to FTB staff who will hear and decide the variance action.
1. Sixty (60) calendar days after a written adverse action determination by FTB staff; to impose an alternative apportionment methodology pursuant to Section 25137
2. One hundred twenty (120) calendar days from filing a claim for refund pursuant to Section 19301; or
3. Sixty (60) calendar days prior to a scheduled protest hearing pursuant to Section 19044.
(B) At the time the taxpayer's petition is filed, the taxpayer shall submit a waiver to the Chief Counsel of the Franchise Tax Board, waiving the confidentiality provisions of Section 19542 with respect to the taxpayer's petition.
If a variance action initiated by the taxpayer pursuant to Section 25137 is not granted by FTB staff, either in whole or in part, or if the variance action was imposed by staff requiring employment of an alternative apportionment methodology in a manner to which the taxpayer objects, the taxpayer may appeal the variance action to the Board, itself.
(C) Upon submittal of the taxpayer's petition and waiver of confidentiality, the Executive Officer of the Franchise Tax Board, or the Executive Officer's designee, shall notify the Franchise Tax Board, itself, of the taxpayer's petition.
(D) If FTB staff have not previously made a determination on the taxpayer's petition on the imposition or request for an alternative apportionment methodology before the Franchise Tax Board, the Chief Counsel of the Franchise Tax Board shall ensure FTB staff determines the alternative apportionment methodology is warranted.
(E) When FTB staff have made a determination on whether the alternative apportionment formula methodology is appropriate, the Chief Counsel of the Franchise Tax Board shall acknowledge to the taxpayer that the petition has been received and set a briefing schedule pursuant to this subsection. Ex-parte communication rules which appear in this Regulation at section 25137(d)(4) apply beginning when the Chief Counsel acknowledges taxpayer's petition and continue while the petition is pending with the Franchise Tax Board, itself, and release when the Franchise Tax Board, itself, renders a decision. Taxpayer shall submit a brief to the Chief Counsel of the Franchise Tax Board within sixty (60) days of the Chief Counsel's acknowledgement.
(3) In the event the taxpayer desires to appeal a variance action to the Three-member board, the following procedures shall apply:
(A) The taxpayer must waive, in writing, the confidentiality provisions of Section 19542 with respect to such variance action, which waiver must be sent to the Franchise Tax Board Chief Counsel,
(B) To file an appeal under this regulation, the taxpayer must submit a brief, as provided for within this section, within sixty (60) calendar days of being notified in writing by FTB staff that a variance action initiated by the taxpayer filing a petition pursuant to Section 25137 was denied, in whole or in part, by FTB staff, or a variance action was imposed by FTB staff requiring employment of an alternative apportionment methodology. After the taxpayer has submitted its opening brief, FTB staff has shall have thirty (30) days to submit its opening brief. Thereafter, the taxpayer has shall have thirty (30) days to submit a reply brief. Further briefing may be required by the Franchise Tax Board, itself. All briefs are subject to the following rules requirements:
1. Opening Bbriefs are limited to double-spaced thirty (30) pages and 12 point font per inch of paper.
2. Reply briefs are limited to double-spaced fifteen (15) pages and 12 font per inch of paper.
3. All briefing must be filed by the parties with the Chief Counsel of the Franchise Tax Board Chief Counsel.
(C) Upon submittal of the taxpayer's opening appeal brief and the written waiver of the confidentiality provisions of Section 19542 with respect to such variance action and to any other facts that may be deemed relevant by the three-member board in making a decision on the variance action, the Franchise Tax Board's Executive Officer, or the Executive Officer's designee, shall notify the Three-member board of the taxpayer's request to have the Three-member board hear and decide the appeal of the variance action.
(D)(F) If a notice of proposed deficiency assessment, within the meaning of Section 19057(a), has not been mailed to the taxpayer with respect to the tax year pertaining to the petition variance action, the taxpayer must shall agree in writing if requested by the Franchise Tax Board to an extension of the statute of limitations for the mailing of the notice of proposed deficiency assessment, until 180 days after the Franchise Tax Board, itself, appeal of the variance action has made its determination during an open session at a regularly-scheduled meeting. been heard and decided by the Franchise Tax Board.
(E)(G) Upon completion of briefing, the Franchise Tax Board, itself, may schedule a hearing during an open session at a regularly-scheduled meeting to consider the taxpayer's petition. notification by the Executive Officer or the Executive Officer’s designee, as provided above in subsection (3)(C), the Franchise Tax Board shall set a hearing in an open session at a Three-member board meeting to hear and decide the taxpayer's appeal of the variance action The taxpayer will shall be notified in writing by Franchise Tax Board staff the Franchise Tax Board of the hearing date.
(F)(H) The Franchise Tax Board, shall give Tthe parties shall have to the appeal thirty (30) minutes to present their respective positions and an additional fifteen (15) minutes for the taxpayer's reply. The Franchise Tax Board, itself, Three-member board has the discretion to allow additional time as warranted. Presentations of the parties at the hearing shall occur as follows:
1. The taxpayer shall first make its opening presentation.
2. FTB staff shall make its opening presentation immediately following the taxpayer's opening presentation.
3. The taxpayer shall make its reply presentation immediately following FTB staff's opening presentation.
(G)(I) Witnesses. A party seeking wishing to have an expert or percipient witness or witnesses testify before the Franchise Tax Board, itself, and the other party to the proceeding no later than fifteen (15) calendar days after the filing of the taxpayer's reply brief prior to the hearing date, of the identity of the witness or witnesses, the general nature of the expected testimony, and the expected duration of the testimony at the hearing.
(H)(J) The Three-member board Franchise Tax Board, itself, shall render its decision on the taxpayer's petition variance action during an open session of a regularly-scheduled meeting. when the Three-member board has reached its decision.
(34) Applicability of Ex-parte Communication. Rules. Except as provided by this regulation, there shall be no ex-parte communication regarding any substantive issue in the petition without notice and opportunity for all parties to participate in the communication.
(A) The Eex-parte communication rules do not apply during the pendency of a petition variance action that is initially submitted before FTB staff. or the Three-member board.
(B) The Eex-parte communication rules apply beginning with the acknowledgement of the taxpayer's petition continuing until a final decision has been rendered, as is set forth in subsection (2)(E) above. The Executive Officer or his or her designee shall notify the Franchise Tax Board, itself, of the applicability of the ex-parte communication rules to the petition. during the pendency of any appeal to the Franchise Tax Board of a variance action as follows: There shall be no communication, direct or indirect, regarding any substantive issue relating to the appeal between any Franchise Tax Board member or Board member staff, appellant or appellant's employee or representative, and/or FTB staff, without notice and opportunity for all parties to participate in the communication.
(C) Applicability of tThe ex-parte communication rules do not apply to communications between members of the Franchise Tax Board, itself, FTB staff, and the taxpayer or its representatives during the pendency of a petition if the communication is only related to the scheduling of a future discussion of the petition, and which only involves one Board member at a time, in which case: ends when the Franchise Tax Board renders its decision on the appeal of a variance action.
(D) Permitted communications between the Franchise Tax Board, FTB staff, and the taxpayer and/or its employees and/or representatives during the pendency of an appeal of a variance action include:
1. Briefs and oral presentations at open session are not ex-parte communications, and are permitted communications.
2. Ex-parte communications are permitted provided that the communication does not pertain to any matters within the variance action, but instead involves communication between the taxpayer, the representative, the board member or Board member staff, and FTB staff that only relates to the scheduling of a future discussion about the substantive matters of the variance action. If this is the goal of such an ex-parte communication, then:
1. The Franchise Tax Board member and/or Board member staff shall invite all parties and/or their representatives, but no other Board members, to participate in a scheduled telephonic discussion or in-person meeting as soon as practicable. Any communication for purposes of setting up arranging this scheduled future discussion or in-person meeting shall only concern the scheduling and not the substance of the petition subject variance request. All parties and/or their representatives and the Franchise Tax Board member and/or Franchise Tax Board member staff shall coordinate to work together and make a reasonable effort to arrange find a mutually agreeable date, time, and place to hold the telephonic discussion or in-person meeting between the parties and one Board member at a time. If the parties cannot agree on a date, time, and place to hold the telephonic discussion or in person meeting by five (5) working days before the scheduled telephonic discussion or in-person meeting, then the meeting it shall not occur be held.
2. If the telephonic discussion or in-person meeting has been scheduled and one of the parties does not participate or attend, then the telephonic discussion or in-person meeting may proceed and will not be considered an ex-parte communication. All parties must be given the opportunity to participate in a telephonic discussion or attend an in-person meeting scheduled at a mutually agreeable place, date, and time. Regardless of whether all parties actually participate in the telephonic discussion or attend the in-person meeting, the Franchise Tax Board member and/or Board member's staff participating in the telephonic discussion or attending the in person meeting must:
a. Document in writing substantive matters discussed at the telephonic discussion or in-person meeting.
b. Provide to all parties and their representatives to the petition, but not to other Board members, on the day subsequent to the telephonic discussion or in-person meeting the documentation pertaining to the substantive matters addressed and copies of any materials distributed by any of the parties shared by the parties, the Franchise Tax Board member, and/or Board member staff participating in the telephonic discussion or attending the in-person meeting. to all parties to the appeal and their representatives within fifteen (15) days of the telephonic discussion or in person meeting. If any party is does not participate in absent from the telephonic discussion or in-person meeting, that party shall have within fifteen (15) days from the date of the telephonic discussion or attend in-person meeting the Franchise Tax Board member and/or the Board member staff must provide an opportunity for the absent party or parties to respond to the substantive matters discussed documentation and the any materials distributed. Such written response shall be provided to the opposing party. for the telephonic discussion or in person meeting within fifteen (15) days of the telephonic discussion or in person meeting. The documentation of specific matters discussed must be in sufficient context and detail to allow the absent party or parties the opportunity to respond to any matters discussed at the telephonic discussion or in person meeting in writing and/or submit any other materials for consideration he or she may wish to provide to the Board member and/or Board member staff. Any such writing or material must also be supplied at the same time to the opposing party or its representatives within ten (10) days before the hearing.
(E)(D) In the event an ex-parte communication occurs, When there has been an ex-parte communication, the Franchise Tax Board member and/or Franchise Tax Board member staff shall document must in writing the substance of the ex-parte communication and shall provide it to the other Franchise Tax Board members and the parties to the petition during the open session of the regularly-scheduled meeting when the petition is considered by the Franchise Tax Board. make a record of the ex-parte communication and provide it to the Franchise Tax Board members present at the Franchise Tax Board's open meeting where the Franchise Tax Board will consider the appeal of the variance action. If any documents are provided or exchanged, copies must be provided to all parties and/or their representatives within fifteen (15) days of the telephonic discussion or in person meeting.
(F) In the event a Franchise Tax Board member and/or or the Board member staff have an inadvertent ex-parte communication with any party to the appeal of a variance action, then the Franchise Tax Board member and/or or the Board member staff must make a record of that ex-parte communication. If any documents are provided or exchanged, they must be identified, made part of the written record, and copies provided to all parties and/or their representatives at the Franchise Tax Board's open meeting where the Franchise Tax Board will hear and decide the appeal of the variance action. The preparation and distribution of such documents are subject to the requirements of Government Code section 11125.2(c).
(G) Because the Bagley-Keene Act, set forth at California Government Code sections 11120 through 11132, prohibits a Franchise Tax Board member from sharing any written or oral information received during an ex-parte communication, even if the communication is inadvertent, with any other Franchise Tax Board member except at a duly noticed open meeting of the Franchise Tax Board, the Franchise Tax Board member involved in an ex-parte communication must report that communication at the formal hearing, where the Franchise Tax Board will hear and decide the appeal of a variance action. The Franchise Tax Board member must disclose the ex-parte communication on the record to the public, and other Franchise Tax Board members, and distribute the writing memorializing the communication as summarized above to the other Franchise Tax Board members, as well as make available all documents exchanged or provided during the ex-parte communication. The preparation and distribution of the documents between the Franchise Tax Board members are subject to the provisions of Government Code section 11125.1(c).
(H) The Franchise Tax Board staff must include a short summary of the ex-parte communication in the minutes of the Franchise Tax Board open meeting at which the ex-parte communication is disclosed.
(5)(4) Applicability date. The amendments to subsection (d) are applicable only as of the effective date of amendments to this subsection of the regulation. revisions to this subsection prospectively apply to variance actions and appeals of variance actions filed on or after the effective date of these changes.
Note: Authority cited: Section 19503, Revenue and Taxation Code.
Reference: Section 25137, Revenue and Taxation Code.